You just learned how to find roles before they're everywhere. Recruiters use the same logic to find people. JobSearchDx checks whether your profile shows up when they look, and tells you exactly what to fix if it doesn't.
Check your findability→I spend maybe an hour a week looking for jobs, and I still see more of what's actually open than people who scroll their feed every day.
The shift is simple. I stopped waiting for roles to show up on LinkedIn and started going to the places jobs land first. Most of what I do comes down to a few habits, none of them complicated, none of them paid.
Boolean search across company career sites
When I'm casting a wide net, I search company career sites directly through Google instead of scrolling a feed. This is the part most people never do, and it's where the real coverage comes from.
Boolean search just means pointing Google at the applicant tracking systems (the software companies use to post their roles) with your own filters for title, industry, and recency. Here's a string you can paste into Google right now and edit:
(site:myworkdayjobs.com OR site:greenhouse.io OR site:lever.co OR site:icims.com OR site:ashbyhq.com OR site:smartrecruiters.com OR site:taleo.net) ("Director of Marketing" OR "VP Marketing" OR "Head of Marketing") ("consumer health" OR "digital health" OR "health tech") ("remote" OR "hybrid")
Swap the titles, the industry words, and the location for whatever fits you. If you're not sure how to build or tweak one, paste your criteria into Claude or ChatGPT and ask it to write the string. It takes seconds.
A few things worth knowing:
- Use the date filter. Click Google's Tools menu and set it to the past week. That's the difference between being early and being applicant number 400.
- Don't over-tighten it. Every extra required keyword quietly deletes roles you'd want. Start broad, then narrow.
- Search capability words, not just titles. Recruiters bury terms like GTM, lifecycle, retention, and positioning in the body of a posting. Those surface roles a title-only search misses.
Which sites to actually point it at
This is the part almost nobody does, and it's where the time savings live. The applicant tracking system a company uses tells you what kind of company it is, so you can aim your search at the platforms where your kind of role actually lives.
Quick tell: you can identify any company's system from the URL of one of its job postings. myworkdayjobs.com is Workday, greenhouse.io is Greenhouse, lever.co is Lever, icims.com is iCIMS, ashbyhq.com is Ashby, smartrecruiters.com is SmartRecruiters, taleo.net is Taleo. Here's how they break down.
Large, established companies (Fortune 500, health plans, health systems, banks, big retail) live on Workday, iCIMS, Taleo, and SmartRecruiters. Workday alone powers roughly a third of enterprise postings. If you want scale, structure, and an established brand, weight your string toward these:
(site:myworkdayjobs.com OR site:icims.com OR site:taleo.net OR site:smartrecruiters.com) ("Director" OR "Senior Director") ("Marketing") ("health plan" OR "payer" OR "health system" OR "pharmacy") ("remote" OR "hybrid")
Venture-backed startups and scaleups are the heart of Greenhouse and Lever. Greenhouse skews toward funded startups and mid-market companies; Lever sits a notch earlier, with growth-stage companies. If you want momentum and funding without enterprise bureaucracy:
(site:greenhouse.io OR site:lever.co) ("Head of Marketing" OR "VP Marketing" OR "GTM" OR "Growth") ("digital health" OR "healthtech" OR "consumer") ("remote")
The newest, hottest startups are on Ashby. It's the fastest-growing system in the market, concentrated at high-growth companies, especially in AI and developer tools. Most job seekers don't search it yet, which is the whole reason to. Add site:ashbyhq.com and run it on its own sometimes to get there early.
Smaller companies and lower mid-market tend to sit on Workable, BambooHR, JazzHR, Breezy, and Recruitee. Add these if you're open to smaller employers, or if you're chasing a niche where the smaller players matter.
The point is to stop running one generic search and start matching the platform to the company. Want big and established? You barely need Greenhouse. Want early and fast-moving? You barely need Taleo. Pointing the search at the right cluster cuts the noise in half.
A target-company list that checks itself
The other half of my search is a list of companies I'd actually say yes to. Mine has about 130 on it right now, and it keeps growing. No single Boolean string surfaces everything across all of them, because companies post to their own career site first and some roles never get syndicated anywhere else. So the only way to really stay on top of a list that size is to check each company at the source.
Doing that by hand every week is the kind of chore people quit after two weeks. So I automated it. I built a system where an AI agent reads my company list, checks each one's job board plus my Gmail alerts, deduplicates against everything I've already seen, scores each new role against my criteria, and logs it. What used to be an hour of clicking is now a few minutes of reading a report. It runs on a schedule, so it happens whether or not I remember to start it.
I wrote up the whole thing (the company list, the job log, the scoring, the sweep) so you can build your own: Automated Job Search Monitoring System.
LinkedIn's own AI search
LinkedIn has its own AI job search now, where you describe what you want in plain language instead of wrestling with filters. I run mine daily. It takes about a minute, and it's the one piece of this that actually lives on LinkedIn. It won't catch the roles that never get posted there, which is why it's one leg of the stool and not the whole thing. But for a fast daily pass, it's worth the minute.
One more place worth a look: VC portfolio job boards
If you're targeting startups, a lot of venture firms list every open role across their portfolio companies in one place on their own site. Pick a few firms whose companies you'd want to work for, find their jobs page once, and bookmark it. They often have roles before the company posts anywhere else.
How this fits in under an hour a week
I work in two blocks a week, one Tuesday and one Thursday. Only the first 30 to 45 minutes of one is really searching. I run my LinkedIn AI search, run four or five saved Boolean strings each tuned to a different slice of what I want, and let the automated sweep watch my company list. Everything after that is applying and reaching out. No paid tools, no subscription, no scrolling.
The half of this that has nothing to do with searching
Everything above is the outbound side: finding the right roles. The inbound side matters just as much, and most people ignore it. While you're searching for jobs, recruiters are searching for people, and they do it with the same kind of keyword search you just learned. If your LinkedIn profile doesn't carry the words they type, you stay invisible. The same way a role that never hits LinkedIn stays invisible to you.
You can see exactly where you stand. I built a check that grades how findable your profile is to recruiters and tells you what to fix: run the findability check.
FAQ
Does Boolean search still work for job hunting in 2026? Yes. The applicant tracking systems it searches (Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS, Ashby, Taleo) are still where most roles get posted first. AI chat tools now build and tweak your strings in seconds, so there's no reason not to use it.
How do I know which job site a company uses? Look at the URL of any current job posting. myworkdayjobs.com is Workday, greenhouse.io is Greenhouse, lever.co is Lever, icims.com is iCIMS, ashbyhq.com is Ashby, smartrecruiters.com is SmartRecruiters, taleo.net is Taleo.
Which sites should I search if I want startup roles? Greenhouse and Lever for funded startups and scaleups, and Ashby for the newest, fastest-growing ones. Add the portfolio job boards of the VC firms backing companies you'd want to work for.
Do I need any paid tools for this? No. The whole thing runs on Google search and your own saved strings. Nothing here costs anything.